|
2:00 - 1:59am
|
Day 1, Tuesday November 8, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
10:30am
|
Welcome, State of the Program, Administrative changes
|
Toepfer
|
|
|
|
10:45am
|
Overview of HFIP FY10 activities and results
|
Gall
|
|
|
|
11:00am
|
Preliminary FY11 verification
|
Franklin
|
|
|
|
11:20am
|
Stream 1
|
Lead: Gall
|
|
|
|
11:20am
|
HWRF in FY11
|
Tallapragada
|
|
|
|
11:35am
|
Prioritized Stream 1.0 needs for FY12
|
Tallapragada & Pasch
|
|
|
|
11:50am
|
Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
1:00pm
|
HFIP Development—Team Reports
|
Lead: Marks
|
|
|
|
1:00pm
|
Team Reports (20 min each)
|
•Global Model/Physics (Benjamin, Brown)
• Regional model/physics (Bender, Kwon)
• Ensemble Systems (Toth, Reynolds)
|
, ,
|
|
|
3:00pm
|
Continue Team Reports (20 min each)
|
• Data Assimilation/Vortex Initialization (Whitaker, LaPenta)
• Verification (Marchok, Brown)
• Applications/Diagnostics (DeMaria, Rappaport)
• Hurricane Observations (Aberson, Knaff)
• Coupled Ocean/wave models (Tolman, Halliwell)
• Socio-Economics (Sprague, Read)
• Summary of AO awards (Melendez)
|
, , , , ,
|
|
|
6:00pm
|
Community Diagnostics Effort
|
|
|
|
|
6:00pm
|
Discussion
|
DeMaria & Talapragada
|
|
|
|
2:00 - 1:59am
|
Day 2, Wednesday November 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
10:00am
|
Visitor program Reports
|
Lead: Gall
|
|
|
|
10:00am
|
NHC visitor program
|
Landsea
|
|
|
|
10:15am
|
HRD aircraft visitor program
|
Aberson
|
|
|
|
10:30am
|
Ensemble reports
|
Lead: Gall
|
|
|
|
10:30am
|
GFS/FIM Ensemble results
|
Whittaker & Benjamin
|
|
|
|
10:50am
|
GFDL ensemble results
|
Marchok
|
|
|
|
11:45am
|
Stream 1.5
|
Lead: Rappaport
|
|
|
|
11:45am
|
Reflections on FY11 from a TCMT perspective
|
Nance & Kucera
|
|
|
|
12:00pm
|
Reflections on FY11 from a NHC perspective
|
Rappaport, Franklin & Pasch
|
|
|
|
12:15pm
|
Initial community expressions of interest/justification for FY12 Stream 1.5 candidacy (10min presentations/discussion each by respondents to prior open invitation)
|
Lead: Pasch
(a) PSU AHW
(b) HRD HWRF
(c) U. Wisconsin
(d) TC-COAMPS
(e) FSU multi-model ensemble
(f) MMM-AHW
(g) GFDL ensemble
(h) High Resolution GFS ensemble
(i) High resolution FIM Ensemble
|
, , , , , , , ,
|
|
|
2:30pm
|
Group discussion of community presentations; resource requirements for FY12; related issues
|
Co-Leads: Pasch & Nance
|
|
|
|
4:00pm
|
HFIP 2010 Experimental Forecast system
|
Lead: Toepher
|
|
|
|
4:00pm
|
Proposal for FY 2012 Experimental forecast System
|
Gall
|
|
|
|
4:15pm
|
Examples of Products from FY2011 season
|
|
|
|
|
4:30pm
|
Group Discussion—Identify priorities for FY2012 Experimental Forecast system
|
Possible presentations for alternative proposals
|
|
|
|
4:30pm
|
Day 2 Wrap-up and next steps
|
Gall
|
|
|
|
2:00 - 1:59am
|
HFIP Regional GSI-Hybrid Data Assimilation Workshop - Agenda
|
|
|
|
|
2:00 - 1:59am
|
Day 3, Thursday November 10, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
10:00am
|
MORNING SESSION 1 – Overarching/Introductory Comments/Operational requirement and capability
|
Chair: Hans Huang
|
|
|
|
10:00am
|
Welcome and background from HFIP
|
Fred Toepfer & Bob Gall
|
|
|
|
10:20am
|
DTC: A unified framework and/or questions to discuss
|
Hui Shao
|
|
|
|
10:40am
|
NHC: hurricane forecast requirement
|
Chris Landsea
|
|
|
|
11:00am
|
NCEP/EMC: operations requirement, ongoing efforts and plan
|
Vijay Tallapragada & Mingjing Tong
|
|
|
|
11:25am
|
NOAA: Global GSI-hybrid system implementation with EnKF and how it could be extended to regional
|
Jeff Whitaker
|
|
|
|
12:00pm
|
MORNING SESSION 2 – Ongoing efforts, requirements and plans for transitions from current real-time ensemble/DA to a unified operational hybrid system
|
Chair: Jeff Whitaker
|
|
|
|
12:00pm
|
NOAA/AOML
|
Tomi Vukicevic
|
|
|
|
12:15pm
|
NOAA/ESRL/GSD
|
Zoltan Toth
|
|
|
|
12:30pm
|
NAVY/NRL
|
Alex Reinecke
|
|
|
|
12:45pm
|
PSU
|
Fuqing Zhang
|
|
|
|
1:00pm
|
Suny Albany
|
Ryan Torn
|
|
|
|
1:15pm
|
University of Oklahoma
|
Xuguang Wang
|
|
|
|
1:30pm
|
NCAR/MMM
|
Arthur P. Mizzi
|
|
|
|
2:30pm
|
AFTERNOON SESSION 2 – Discussion
|
Chair: Brian Etherton, Vijay Tallapragada)
|
|
|
|
2:30pm
|
Targeted discussion
|
Summary of the presentations (Brian) and requirements (Vijay)
• How would our collaboration be?
o What is the current system? How to work based on it? How many
contributors are we expecting? What are the EMC requirements?
Community requirements?
• How can we manage the collaboration and monitor the progress?
• Who will make decisions? A committee? What procedure to follow?
• What development work needs to be done in the short term to make
the GSI-hybrid system a viable alternative for those folks to run next
year.
o GSI system – EMC baseline, how to let others build on it?
o Ensemble system – EMC baseline, how to let others build on it?
o Hybrid system- What are the common parts to be generalized?
How to do it? By whom? How to incorporate community
contributions (especially those using different packages)
o How to test the system and incorporate contributions from
community
• Testing metrics
• Distributed testing or centered
o Milestones/deliverables – goals realistic? Computational resources?
Timeline? POCs?
• How will the development of the GSI-hybrid system interact with
development of the existing system(s), e.g., GSI.
|
|
|
|
4:15pm
|
Summary and steps towards formalizing the plan
|
A list of requirements, and a development and testing plan (timeline,
POCs, etc)
|
|
|
